To help farmers decide how much debt farmland can support, Joe Horner asks them
to calculate payments not in dollars but in bushels of corn. That may surprise
some on how cheap land has become.
Horner led those at the 2012 Breimyer Seminar through his way of
thinking about how much mortgage payment a farm can absorb.
The University of Missouri seminar on land prices reminded Horner of
his days in a county extension office.
“Impossible-to-answer questions came in the front door,” he recalls.
“What’s a farm worth?”
Now Horner is an agricultural economist with MU Extension in
Columbia. He tackles those questions as if he were working across the kitchen
table with a farmer.
Land-price questions require individual decisions, he says. Not all
land is created equal. The same answer won’t fit everyone.
Every speaker at the seminar recalled the land-price boom of the
1970s —and the land-price bust of the 1980s. Horner doesn’t see much similarity
in recent rapid increases in land prices.
He showed the changing value in the Missouri corn and soybean crop.
In 1970, the combined corn-soybean value was $500 million. In 2011, combined
value shot up to $4.5 billion.
“A whole lot more money popped up out in rural Missouri just in the
last five years,” he says. “You see a lot of new grain bins, bigger tractors and
more combines. But you can only buy so much new equipment.”
Land becomes an asset for investment, but he noted that there’s not
much land changing hands. When land becomes available, several bidders are
waiting. Expect prices to increase.
“When reading news of high land prices, just remember, we are not
Iowa,” he says.
Horner notes that farmers’ debt-to-asset ratios have dropped steadily
since the farm crisis of the 1980s. Now, most farmers are on solid financial
footing, unlike in the land rush of the 1970s.
“It’s hard to accumulate debt when assets are piling up,” Horner
says.
On average, debt accounts for about 13 percent of farm assets today.
In 1977, debts accounted for 20 percent of farm assets.
Land does represent the biggest share of farm debt, however. The land
debt runs about 55 percent of all farm debt, according to recent
reports.
The answer to how much debt farmland will support varies from farm to
farm. Land on hills may be better suited for grass for cows, while river bottoms
are best for corn and soybeans. Cash flow will be different for each
farm.
Another variable: Value of corn and beans changed dramatically over
the last 50 years.
To help farmers decide how much land can be worth, Horner converts
land price from dollars to bushels of corn.
His chart shows that in 1980, mortgage payment took 80 percent of the
gross corn income from an acre. Last year, with record yields and prices, land
payments dropped to 35 percent of corn gross.
Rush out and buy high-priced land, right? It’s easy to pay for in
bushels of corn.
Horner the economist showed his other hand. He asked, “What price
will you put on that bushel of corn?”
Possibilities are a historic average for 50 years, the 2011 price,
last month’s price or the FAPRI baseline price for 10 years ahead. They all
differ.
While commodity prices may vary, production costs continue
upward.
“Reality isn’t always clear,” Horner says. Learning the capital
debt-repayment capacity requires a serious look at each farm’s ability to
generate cash.
Horner took the group through his budget, based on prices of $4.50 a
bushel for corn and $9 for soybeans. “This is how I’d help a farmer work through
this,” he said.
In his calculations, Horner added no off-farm income to the budget.
He recalls that in the 1980s income from a spouse made it possible for farms to
survive. But with changes in prices, that $20,000 income might not carry much
weight.
Working through his budget, assuming a corn-soy rotation with his
$4.50 and $9 prices —with no extravagant family living —he maxed out at about
$200 per acre per year to service debt. That includes $100 for non-land debt.
But only $100 is available for the mortgage.
While Horner remains optimistic, he adds caution in his advice to
farmers. “This could be another bell-ringing year.” But, he admits, “It is
easier to look back than to look forward.”
No comments:
Post a Comment